Batiste
Batiste v. City of Richmond
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID BATISTE, Case No. 22-cv-01188-AMO
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND
GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT
v. CITY OF RICHMOND’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT &
CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., DENYING DEFENDANT MENDOZA’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Defendants. JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 69,
Pending before the Court are Defendant City of Richmond’s (“Richmond”) and Defendant Hugo Mendoza’s (“Mendoza”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motions for summary judgment. The Court heard argument on the motions on June 15, 2023. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant Mendoza’s motion for summary judgment and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant Richmond’s motion for summary judgment, for the reasons stated below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff David Batiste filed this employment…