Eisen
Eisen v. Day
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NOAM EISEN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05349-VKD
Plaintiffs,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
v. VIOLATION OF ADR LOCAL RULE 7-4 EMILY DAY, Re: Dkt. No. 108 Defendant.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 14 On November 15, 2023, plaintiff and counter-defendant Noam Eisen filed an opposition (Dkt. No. 108) to defendant and counter-claimant Emily Day’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 106). Mr. Eisen’s opposition includes representations regarding the parties’ communications and positions during settlement conferences with Magistrate Judge Beeler to which Ms. Day objects. See Dkt. No. 108 at 4; Dkt. No. 108-1 ¶ 7; Dkt. No. 109 at 2. ADR Local Rule 7-4 requires parties and counsel to treat information exchanged during settlement conferences as confidential and to refrain from disclosing this information to the assigned judge, subject to certain exceptions. See ADR L.R. 7-4; Shields v.…