Grewell

Grewell v. K.B.R. Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20235:23-cv-03889California514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RACHAEL LETICIA GREWELL, Case No. 23-cv-03889-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE

v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

K.B.R. INC., [Re: ECF No. 13] Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Rachel Leticia Grewell’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 13). Defendant K.B.R. Inc. did not file an opposition to the motion. Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend “shall be freely given when justice so requires,” bearing in mind “the underlying purpose of Rule15 . . . [is] to facilitate decision on the merits, rather than on the pleadings or technicalities.” Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (quotation marks and citation omitted). In deciding whether to grant leave to amend, the Court must consider the factors set forth by the Supreme Court in Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.