In re SVB Financial Group Securities Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20235:23-cv-01097California1,753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 In re SVB Financial Group Securities Case No. 3:23-cv-01097-JD

Litigation

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES,

APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF, AND

SETTING CASE SCHEDULE

The Court orders as follows in this securities putative class action. I. CONSOLIDATION Plaintiffs Mahendra Sreerama, Tamir Einy, KBC Asset Management NV (KBC), Norges Bank (Norges), and Sjunde AP-Fonden (AP7) ask to consolidate this case with six later-filed cases in this District: Snook v. SVB Financial Group (3:23-cv-01173), Siddiqui v. Becker (3:23-cv- 01228), Hialeh Employees v. Becker (3:23-cv-01697), International Union of Operating Engineers v. SVB (3:23-cv-01962), Stevenson v. Becker (4:23-cv-02277), and Rossi v. Becker (3:23-cv-02335). See Dkt. Nos. 31, 35, 38, and 44. The motions are unopposed. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) permits consolidation of “actions involving a common question of law or fact.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). “Consolidation is within the broad …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.