Shenkman

Return on Intelligence, Ltd. v. Shenkman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20234:18-cv-00262California880 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RETURN ON INTELLIGENCE, LTD., et Case No. 18-cv-00262-JSW al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' OFFER OF PROOF v. Re: Dkt. No. 141

GREGORY SHENKMAN,

11 Defendant.

12 This matter is scheduled for a bench trial on December 4, 2023. It is undisputed that, during discovery, neither Plaintiffs nor Defendant identified any expert witnesses. In their pretrial filings, Plaintiffs listed Alexander Novak and Sergiy Sinyansky as witnesses and intend to elicit testimony from them regarding Plaintiffs’ alleged damages. (Dkt. No. 131-2.) Defendant objected to their testimony as follows: “The defendant objects to his providing undisclosed expert type testimony.” (Id.) At the pretrial conference, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to provide an offer of proof regarding the testimony at issue. Plaintiffs have submitted their offer of proof, and Defendant has responded. Defendant maintains that Plaintiffs are offering…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.