De Tagle v. Santa Clara County, San Jose Police Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AUSTIN DE TAGLE, Case No. 23-cv-05095-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE SERVICE OF PROCESS
v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 9 SAN JOSE POLICE OFFICER JULIAN #4610, 12 Defendant.
13 Plaintiff Austin de Tagle, who is representing himself, filed an amended complaint in this this civil rights action naming “San Jose Police Officer Julian #4610” as the sole defendant. Dkt. No. 6. The Court has issued orders screening Mr. de Tagle’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), granting his application to proceed in forma pauperis, and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve Officer Julian with the summons and amended complaint in this case. Dkt. Nos. 5, 7. On November 27, 2023, the Marshal returned the summons unexecuted as to Officer Julian, stating that the Deputy Marshal who attempted service was unable to locate the defendant. Dkt. No. 9. The Deputy Marshal further reports that service was attempted at the San Jose Police Department but…