Quackenbush

Quackenbush v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20233:20-cv-05599California7,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARY QUACKENBUSH, and MARISSA FEENEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, No. C 20-05599 WHA

Plaintiffs,

v.

ORDER RE TRIAL AND POST

TRIAL MOTIONS

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR

COMPANY, INC.,

15 Defendant.

INTRODUCTION In this certified consumer class action involving an alleged defective car part, there are a variety of motions from both parties: (1) defendant moves to decertify the class (Dkt. No. 350); (2) defendant renews their motion for judgment as a matter of law (Dkt. No. 357, 382); (3) plaintiffs move to alter judgment (Dkt. No. 381); (4) plaintiffs move for attorney’s fees and service award (Dkt. No. 377). There are also two outstanding motions to seal (Dkt. Nos. 294, 396). This order addresses each in turn. STATEMENT The facts of this action are more thoroughly recounted in prior orders. See Quackenbush v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc., 650 F. Supp. 3d 837, 840–42 (N.D.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.