Quackenbush
Quackenbush v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARY QUACKENBUSH, and MARISSA FEENEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, No. C 20-05599 WHA
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER RE TRIAL AND POST
TRIAL MOTIONS
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR
COMPANY, INC.,
15 Defendant.
INTRODUCTION In this certified consumer class action involving an alleged defective car part, there are a variety of motions from both parties: (1) defendant moves to decertify the class (Dkt. No. 350); (2) defendant renews their motion for judgment as a matter of law (Dkt. No. 357, 382); (3) plaintiffs move to alter judgment (Dkt. No. 381); (4) plaintiffs move for attorney’s fees and service award (Dkt. No. 377). There are also two outstanding motions to seal (Dkt. Nos. 294, 396). This order addresses each in turn. STATEMENT The facts of this action are more thoroughly recounted in prior orders. See Quackenbush v. Am. Honda Motor Co., Inc., 650 F. Supp. 3d 837, 840–42 (N.D.…