Rearden LLC v. The Walt Disney Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 REARDEN LLC, et al., Case No. 17-cv-04006-JST
Plaintiffs,
PRETRIAL ORDER
v.
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
12 The Court now rules as follows regarding certain disputes raised in the parties’ Revised Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, ECF No. 593, and Revised Joint Proposed and Disputed Jury Instructions, ECF No. 594. I. Evidence of the Injunction/Post-Injunction Conduct (ECF No. 593 at 23) Construing Disney’s argument as a motion in limine, the motion is denied. II. Jury Instructions Re SHST Decisions (ECF No. 593 at 28) The Court will give the following instructions: Special Instruction No. 1: The SHST Statement of Decision and Appeal You [will hear/have heard] about a prior lawsuit between Rearden and a company called Shezhenshi Haitiecheng Science and Technology Co. Ltd., which I will refer to as “SHST.” SHST was an affiliate of DD3. On August 11, 2017, the trial court in the SHST lawsuit issued a decision…