Yeh

Yeh v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20234:23-cv-01790California2,950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HENRY YEH, Case No. 23-cv-01790-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND AND

v. TERMINATING AS MOOT

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

TWITTER, INC., AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL

NOTICE

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 31, 32

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Henry Yeh’s motion to remand and Defendant Twitter’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 22, 31. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand, Dkt. No. 22, and TERMINATES AS MOOT the motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 31, as well as the associated request for judicial notice, Dkt. No. 32. I. BACKGROUND To provide adequate procedural background on this motion, the Court begins not with the origins of this case, but of another: Price v. Twitter, Inc. Price v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.