Golson

Golson v. Narvaez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20233:18-cv-01966California4,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMAR BRANDON GOLSON, Case No. 18-cv-01966-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

J. NARVAEZ, et al., JUDGMENT;

Defendants. ORDER REFERRING THE ACTION

FOR SETTLEMENT;

ORDER STAYING ACTION

13 Dkt. No.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jamar Brandon Golson alleges in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action that Salinas Valley State Prison correctional officers used excessive force against him and that medical staff were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, thereby violating his Eighth Amendment rights. Defendants move for summary judgment on grounds that Golson did not exhaust his administrative remedies against medical staff, and on grounds that the correctional officers used force in a good-faith effort to restore and maintain discipline. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED regarding the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.