Dominguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIJAH DOMINGUEZ, Case No. 23-cv-00981-HSG

Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. CONSOLIDATE, MOTIONS FOR

MANDAMUS, QUO WARRANTO, AND

DAN PRATT, et al., RELIEF A FROM JUDGMENT OR

ORDER, AND MOTION TO APPOINT

Defendants. COUNSEL1 Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 28, 29, 30,

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate, Motions for Mandamus, Quo Warranto, and Relief from a Judgment or Order, and Motion to Appoint Counsel. Dkt. Nos. 29, 28, 30, 26, and 31. For the reasons detailed below, the Court denies them all. I. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE By his motion, Plaintiff requests to consolidate two cases before Judge Beeler – Elijah Dominguez v. Dan Pratts (23-cv-00981) and Elijah Dominguez v. John Allan Abaci (23-cv-03669) – in order to “avoid confusion and conflicting evidence[.]” Dkt. No. 29. Plaintiff does not explain why…