Adams

Adams v. Kerr

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20235:20-cv-08557California1,438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ADRIAN O. ADAMS, Case No. 20-cv-08557-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS

v. AGAINST DEFENDANT DUMARS

ERIC DUMARS, [Re: ECF No. 76] Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Eric Dumars’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Adrian Adams’s claims against Dumars. Adams failed to file an opposition to the motion. ECF No. 76 (“Mot.”). The Court previously found the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. ECF No. 79; Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND This is a pro se civil rights action brought by Adams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various officials in the Santa Cruz district attorney’s office and sheriff’s department and court- appointed attorneys and individuals. ECF No. 18 (“SAC”). The Court thoroughly described the background of this case, its procedural history, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.