Williams v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20233:22-cv-07149California2,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL WILLIAMS, et al., Case No. 3:22-cv-07149-JD

Plaintiffs,

SECOND ORDER RE MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.

This litigation arises out of a transfer of plaintiff Michael Williams’s personal funds to an account at J.P. Morgan Chase, N.A. (Chase), which was opened in the name of plaintiff Immunogenetics.com (Immunogenetics), a company owned and controlled by Williams. Dkt. No. 40 (amended complaint). This is the second round of pleadings motions with respect to the sufficiency of the allegations in the complaint, and the parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed. A summary of the salient facts is provided in the order dismissing the prior complaint with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 36. Chase has moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt No. 43. The amended complaint is dismissed. I. STANDING Chase says that the misappropriated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.