Doe
Doe v. Washington Township Health Care District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05016-SI
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. REMAND AND REMANDING CASE
TO STATE COURT
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HEALTH CARE DISTRICT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 9 Defendants. 10 Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion to remand. Dkt. No. 12. Defendants oppose. Dkt. No. 15. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the December 8, 2023 hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion and REMANDS the case to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. 16 BACKGROUND This class action lawsuit arises from defendants’ alleged violations of plaintiffs’ medical privacy rights. Plaintiffs (Jane Doe and Jan Doe), who along with putative class members are patients and users of defendants’ services, allege that defendants (collectively “Washington 21 …