Gonzalez
Gonzalez v. City of Alameda
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIO GONZALEZ, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09733-DMR
Plaintiffs, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF ARENALES' v. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL CITY OF ALAMEDA, et al., SHOULD BE SEALED Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.
12 Pending before the court is Plaintiff Edith Arenales’ Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed. [Docket No. 92.] The Gonzalez Plaintiffs, as the designating party, filed a statement in support of Arenales’ motion. [Docket No. 94.] The Gonzalez Plaintiffs ask the court to seal a footnote in the parties’ July 27, 2023 joint discovery letter (the “JDL”) referring to an email sent by Julia Sherwin, the Gonzalez Plaintiffs’ counsel, to a legal listserv.1 The court ruled on the JDL on August 11, 2023. [Docket No. 100.] There is a “strong presumption in favor of access” to court records. Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). …