In re Cupertino Electric Inc. Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20235:23-cv-04007California707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KEVIN CROWL, Case No. 23-cv-04007-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES

v. [Re: ECF No. 14] CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC., Defendant.

JAY WISE, Case No. 23-cv-04232-BLF Plaintiff, v.

CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC., Defendant.

17 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Kevin Crowl and Jay Wise’s motion to consolidate Crowl v. Cupertino Electric, Inc., 5:23-cv-04007-BLF (N.D. Cal.), and Wise v. Cupertino Electric, Inc., 5:23-cv-04232-BLF (N.D. Cal.). ECF No. 14. Defendant Cupertino Electric, Inc. does not oppose the motion. The Court finds the motion appropriate for disposition without oral argument, and hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for March 28, 2024. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD “If actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.