Dyer

Dyer v. DOES 1-10

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20233:23-cv-01226California1,435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIN JI GOO DYER,

Case No. 23-cv-01226-JCS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART EX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO

JOHN DOES 1-10, SERVE THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS

PRIOR TO A RULE 26(F) Defendant. CONFERENCE

ORDER TO FILE REDACTED

APPLICATION

15 Re: Dkt. No. 17

18 Plaintiff, who is now proceeding pro se, has filed an Ex Parte Application for Leave to Serve Third-Party Subpoena, dkt. no. 17 (“Second Application”). As a preliminary matter, the Court has locked this document to deny public access to it because it lists the full birth dates of a number of individuals. Under Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which sets forth privacy protections for filings with the Court, filings that contain birth dates may only list the birth year of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.