Dyer
Dyer v. DOES 1-10
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20233:23-cv-01226California1,435 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MIN JI GOO DYER,
Case No. 23-cv-01226-JCS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART EX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO
JOHN DOES 1-10, SERVE THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS
PRIOR TO A RULE 26(F) Defendant. CONFERENCE
ORDER TO FILE REDACTED
APPLICATION
15 Re: Dkt. No. 17
18 Plaintiff, who is now proceeding pro se, has filed an Ex Parte Application for Leave to Serve Third-Party Subpoena, dkt. no. 17 (“Second Application”). As a preliminary matter, the Court has locked this document to deny public access to it because it lists the full birth dates of a number of individuals. Under Rule 5.2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which sets forth privacy protections for filings with the Court, filings that contain birth dates may only list the birth year of the…