Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. v. Sigray, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20235:21-cv-01129California1,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY, Case No. 21-cv-01129-EJD (VKD)

INC.,

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER v. PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED

SIGRAY, INC.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 134, 143 12 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. (“Carl Zeiss”) and defendant Sigray, Inc. (“Sigray”) have both filed statements pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f) (Dkt. Nos. 181, 182) asking the Court to seal materials filed in connection with a February 23, 2023 motion for discovery sanctions by Carl Zeiss (Dkt. Nos. 134, 143). Carl Zeiss withdrew its motion on April 18, but the sealing motions remained pending until Judge Davila issued an order directing the parties to file responsive statements. See Dkt. Nos. 151, 180. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.