McArthur

McArthur v. Alameda County Public Defender's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20234:21-cv-09412California8,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANCIS MCARTHUR, Case No. 21-cv-09412-KAW

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOLLOWING PRETRIAL

v. CONFERENCE

ALAMEDA COUNTY PUBLIC Re: Dkt. Nos. 114, 119 DEFENDER'S OFFICE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 I. MOTIONS IN LIMINE Plaintiff Francis McArthur has filed nine motions in limine, while Defendants Office of the Alameda County Public Defender, Diane Bellas, Brendon Woods, Robert Shipway, Youseef Elias, Alameda County Board of Supervisors, and County of Alameda have filed seven motions in limine. (Pl.’s MIL,1 Dkt. No. 119; Def.’s MIL, Dkt. No. 114.) A. Plaintiff’s MIL No. 1: Exclusion of Michael J. Aye’s Expert Testimony Plaintiff seeks to exclude the testimony of Defendants’ expert, Michael J. Aye, on the grounds that: (1) Mr. Aye is seeking to opine on a legal conclusion, and (2) Mr. Aye’s opinion is not reliable. (Pl.’s MIL at 4.) Mr. Aye has litigated Sexually Violent Predator Act (“SVPA”) cases…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.