Perkins
Perkins v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 QUINCY GRIFFIN PERKINS, Case No. 23-cv-00502-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. INTERVENE
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 27, 32 et al., 11 Defendants.
12 Proposed Intervenor Tiffany Nance (“Nance”), whose counsel is counsel of record in a 13 materially identical case filed in the Eastern District of California four months after this case was filed, moves to intervene in this case. Nance argues intervention in this case (“Perkins”) is 15 necessary in order for her counsel to protect her and similarly situated warehouse workers’ 16 currently or formerly employed by defendant Hadco Metal Trading Santa Fe Springs CA d/b/a Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (“Ryder”) fiduciary interests in their wage and hour claims.2 18 Specifically, Nance admits that her counsel wants to intervene in this case in order to: (1) ascertain 19 whether a purported settlement that was reached covering this and another case pending in this 20 District (Jose Johnson & Ignacio Parks v.…