Zimmerman

Zimmerman v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20234:22-cv-07609California2,515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LYNN ZIMMERMAN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07609-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

L'OREAL USA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 64 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant L’Oréal USA, Inc.’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 64 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7 1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Lynn Zimmerman, Toni Heuchan, and Marie Giordano filed this putative class action alleging that Defendant misleadingly advertises the sunscreen benefits of some of its cosmetic products. Dkt. No. 9 (“FAC.”).1 Plaintiff Zimmerman alleges that she purchased L’Oréal Infallible Fresh Wear 24HR Foundation (“Fresh Wear” or “Fresh Wear foundation”) on multiple occasions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.