Clements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGE BERNARD CLEMENTS, Case No. 23-cv-05202-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

MILOUS JAMES IVORY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff George Bernard Clements, Jr.’s (“Clements”) unopposed motion to remand. The matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-6. This Order assumes familiarity with the facts of the case, the parties’ arguments, and the relevant law. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to remand for the following reasons. Clements argues that remand is proper because removal was untimely and the well-pleaded complaint does not raise a federal question. ECF 8 at 1-2. Defendant Milous James Ivory (“Ivory”), who removed the case, failed to respond to the motion to remand. The Court agrees with Clements. The notice of removal was…