Roshan
Roshan v. Lawrence
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PEYMAN ROSHAN, Case No. 21-cv-01235-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE
v. MOTION TO AMEND ORDERS TO
PERMIT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
MELANIE J. LAWRENCE, et al., Re: ECF No. 173 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Peyman Roshan’s motion for certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The Court will deny the motion. The final judgment rule ordinarily provides that courts of appeal shall have jurisdiction only over “final decisions of the district courts of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 1291. However, “[w]hen a district judge, in making in a civil action an order not otherwise appealable under this section, shall be of the opinion that such order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, he shall so state in writing in such order.” 28 U.S.C. §…