Clark v. VIP PetCare, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIE KAY CLARK, Case No. 22-cv-08935-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. TRANSFER
VIP PETCARE, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Defendant VIP Petcare, LLC’s motion to transfer. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Doctor Julie Kay Clark (“Clark”), pro se, is a resident of White Bluff Tennessee, ECF 36 (“Second Amended Complaint” or “SAC”) at 1. As a former independent contractor for Defendant VIP Petcare, LLC (“VIP”), Clark performed veterinary services at clinics in Pet Co, Pet Supermarkets, and Tractor Supply stores in the Middle Tennessee area. Id. at 6, 53. Clark does not presently live within California or the Northern…