N.A.
N.A. v. Nintendo of America Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 N.A., Case No. 23-cv-02424-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL
v. ARBITRATION OR TRANSFER
NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendant.
Plaintiff N.A., by and through his Guardian, Bruce Alls, filed this putative class action against Defendant Nintendo of America, Inc. (“Nintendo”) for claims arising out of N.A.’s in- game purchases made while playing Nintendo’s video game Mario Kart Tour. Nintendo now moves to compel arbitration, or in the alternative, to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [Docket No. 24.] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to compel arbitration is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. N.A.’s Complaint N.A. is a minor. He alleges that one of Nintendo’s most popular games is Mario Kart Tour, a series of racing games…