Richter
Richter v. Oracle America, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 HAONING RICHTER, Case No. 22-cv-04795-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. ALTER JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' ORACLE AMERICA, INC., FEES Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 60, 61]
12 Before the Court are Plaintiff Haoning Richter’s Motion to Alter Judgment (ECF No. 60) and Defendant Oracle America, Inc.’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (ECF No. 61). The Court previously vacated the hearing on both motions, finding them suitable for submission without oral argument. See ECF No. 83; Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, Richter’s motion is DENIED and Oracle’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND The background of this case was laid out in detail in the Court’s Orders denying the preliminary injunction and granting the motion to dismiss. See Richter v. Oracle Am., Inc., No. 22-cv-04795-BLF, 2023…