Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00485-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS TWITTER, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 117 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Following an interlocutory appeal of this Court’s August 19, 2021 order granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss, dkt. no. 69 (“August 19 Order”), one claim remains in this case. Presently before the Court is Defendant X Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, dkt. no. 117 (“Motion”), in which it contends this remaining claim must be dismissed under Does 1-6 v. Reddit, Inc., 51 F.4th 1137, 1139 (9th Cir. 2022), cert. denied sub nom. Does v. Reddit, Inc., 143 S. Ct. 2560 (2023). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable for determination without oral argument and therefore vacates the hearing scheduled for December 15, 2023. The Case Management Conference…