Cohen
Cohen v. CBR Systems, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMY COHEN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06527-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR ORDER TO
v. CONSOLIDATE ARBITRATIONS
CBR SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 80 Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for an order to consolidate arbitrations. Dkt. No. 80. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. Dkt. No. 80. I. BACKGROUND This case involves a dispute over the annual fees for cord blood storage charged by Defendants GI Partners and CBR Systems Inc. Dkt. No. 80 at 3. Plaintiffs allege that “Defendants uniformly and deceptively misled consumers into contracting for cord blood storage services by offering a fixed fee for storage years 2-18 when, in actuality, Defendants surreptitiously increased…