Perata

Perata v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 12, 20233:21-cv-02819California2,127 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SARAH PERATA, Case No. 21-cv-02819-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO REOPEN

v. DISCOVERY

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Re: Dkt. No. 126

FRANCISCO,

11 Defendant. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Sarah Perata’s Motion to Reopen Discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 16, or alternatively Rule 6, for the purpose of permitting Defendant City and County of San Francisco the option of taking depositions of four witnesses disclosed by Perata in her supplemental disclosure. ECF No. 126. Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Perata’s Motion. II. BACKGROUND This action commenced on April 19, 2021. ECF No. 1. According to the Case Management Order dated July 21, 2021, fact discovery was initially set to conclude on March 31, 2022. ECF No. 16. The parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.