Etop Udo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ETOP UDO, Case No. 23-cv-02935-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS, WITHOUT LEAVE TO

v. AMEND

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 24, 25, 59 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration are motions to dismiss filed by Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”), BMO Harris Bank, N.A. (“BMO Harris”), and U.S. Bank, N.A. (“US Bank”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers relevant legal authority, and the record in this case. The Court GRANTS each of the motions, without leave to amend. The Court addresses two preliminary matters. First, BANA argues the Court should strike Udo’s omnibus opposition because it exceeds the Court’s page limitations. Udo could have filed four separate 15 page briefs in response to Defendants’ motions. Accordingly, the Court denies BANA’s request. Second, Udo submitted exhibits with his opposition:…