Coxon
Coxon v. Attorney General of the United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BENJAMIN COXON, Case No. 21-cv-09384-JD
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
v. RECOMMENDATION, AND
DISMISSING CASE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 This action was filed by pro se plaintiff Benjamin Coxon against the Attorney General of 13 the United States, “a United States Attorney,” and “a United States District Court.” Dkt. No. 1. 14 After granting Coxon’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, a magistrate judge 15 screened the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and concluded that it was deficient. Dkt. 16 No. 9. Among other things, Coxon’s complaint was “incomprehensible in almost every respect 17 and fail[ed] to state a viable claim for relief.” Id. at 2. The magistrate judge set a deadline of July 18 14, 2023, for Coxon to file an amended complaint that corrected the identified deficiencies. Id. 19 Coxon did not file an amended complaint by that deadline, and so on July 17, 2023, the 20 magistrate judge issued a report…