Rao

Rao v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20235:23-cv-02337California181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CHITTARANJAN RAO, Case NO: 5:23-cv-02337 NC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL y DISMISSAL Dkt. No. 29 TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant.

= 14 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

GQ 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

|| action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the

|| Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed by February 8, 2024. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case with termination date of February 8, || 2024. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: December 13, 2023 h-_———— …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.