Sahdev

Sahdev v. Hyundai Motor America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20235:22-cv-01968California2,846 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NITIN SAHDEV, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-01968-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS' FEES

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, Re: ECF No. 40 Defendant.

Plaintiffs filed the instant attorneys’ fees motion following their acceptance of Defendant’s Rule 68 offer of judgment. The Court found this motion suitable for determination without oral argument per Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Based on the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. I. BACKGROUND On March 28, 2022, Plaintiffs Nitin Sahdev and Mishal Rani filed this suit pursuant to the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act relating to their 2016 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid SE. ECF No. 1. On February 3, 2023, Defendant Hyundai Motor America served a Rule 68 offer of judgment on Plaintiffs, providing separate offers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.