Brown

Brown v. Citi Mortgage, inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20233:23-cv-04186California304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LENORA BROWN, Case No. 23-cv-04186-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

CITI MORTGAGE, INC., et al., Defendants.

14 The Court entered a temporary restraining order against defendant Dyck O’Neal barring sale or foreclosure of plaintiff Lenora Brown’s residence, because she “raised a serious question on the merits of Dyck O’Neal’s interest in her residence,” and “the balance of hardships tips heavily in her favor.” Dkt. No. 15 (citing Pangea Legal Servs. v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 512 F. Supp. 3d 966, 972 (N.D. Cal. 2021)). The Court directed Dyck to show cause by December 1, 2023, why a preliminary injunction should not issue. See id. More than 10 days have passed since that deadline, and Dyck has not filed any response or otherwise communicated with the Court. Dyck has not proffered any facts in response to Brown’s showing that she is entitled to injunctive relief for the reasons stated in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.