Saeed

Saeed v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20233:23-cv-03249California2,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GAMILAH SAEED and MOHAMMED Case No. 23-cv-03249-TSH

SALEH,

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS v. Re: Dkt. No. 20 ANTHONY BLINKEN, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION In this immigration matter, Plaintiffs Gamilah Ahmed Hussein Saeed and her adult son, Mohammed Sanad Saleh, challenge the denial of Saleh’s visa application. Pending before the Court is the government’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), in which it argues the doctrine of consular nonreviewability prohibits judicial review of the decision. ECF No. 20. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition (ECF No. 23) and the government filed a Reply (ECF No. 28). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the January 4, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.