Ulloa II v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL ANGEL ULLOA II, Case No. 23-cv-01752-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES Re: Dkt. No.
USA, INC.,
11 Defendant. 12 In this putative class action, Plaintiff Michael Angel Ulloa II sues his former employer Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. alleging wage and hour violations under California law. Defendant moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (FAC). [Docket No. 25.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant employed Plaintiff as a “Flex Officer” from May 2022 to October 2022. As a Flex Officer, Plaintiff filled in for security officers on leave, provided security for special events, and temporarily staffed new accounts. [Docket No. 24 (FAC) ¶ 4.] …