Osinek

Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20233:13-cv-03891California7,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONDA OSINEK, et al., Case No. 13-cv-03891-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STRIKE

PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC, et al., Docket No. 312 Defendants. 12 13 The United States has sued the following Kaiser entities in this False Claims Act (“FCA”) litigation: (1) Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (“KFHP”); (2) Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado (“KFHP Colorado”); (3) The Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (“TPMG”); (4) Southern California Permanente Medical Group (“SoCal PMG”); and (5) Colorado Permanente Medical Group, P.C. (“Colorado PMG”). KFHP and KFHP Colorado are health plans; the remaining Kaiser entities are physician medical groups. KFHP, TPMG, and SoCal PMG all provide services in California; KFHP Colorado and Colorado PMG provide services in Colorado. Each defendant filed an amended answer in September 2023. See Docket Nos. 298-302 (amended …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.