Davis

Davis v. Pinterest, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20234:19-cv-07650California1,193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HAROLD DAVIS, Case No. 19-cv-07650-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STRIKE BILL OF COSTS AND

v. MOTION TO SEAL

PINTEREST, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 231, 232 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Harold Davis’s motion to strike the bill of costs. Dkt. No. 231. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. MOTION TO STRIKE In May 2022, the Court granted Defendant Pinterest Inc.’s motion for summary judgment and denied Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. No. 211. Shortly thereafter, Defendant filed a bill of costs for $27,812.09 pursuant to Rule 54(d). See Dkt. No. 215. The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the grant of summary judgment in Defendant’s favor. See Dkt. Nos. 229, 230. And Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.