Vitale

Vitale v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20235:23-cv-06019California1,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 FRANCESCO VITALE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-06019-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY

v. RESTRAINING ORDER

WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL [Re: ECF No. 5] ASSOCIATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 On November 21, 2023, Plaintiffs Francesco and Frances Vitale, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for a temporary restraining order, seeking to enjoin a foreclosure sale on the property located at 4067 Cory Street, Suite 2, Soquel, California 95073 (“the Property”). ECF No. 5 (“Mot.”). On November 22, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to serve the motion on Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., WT Capital Lender Services, and Browning Law Group and ordered Defendants to file a response. ECF No. 8. On December 1, 2023, Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. filed an opposition to the motion. ECF No. 10 (“Opp.”). The Court finds the motion appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.