Unicorn Energy AG v. Tesla, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 UNICORN ENERGY AG, Case No. 21-cv-07476-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING UNICORN’S
v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER
TESLA INC., OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 291]
12 Plaintiff Unicorn Energy AG (“Unicorn”) filed a Motion for Relief from Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen’s Nondispositive Pretrial Order (ECF No. 279 (“Order”)), which granted in part and denied in part Unicorn’s motion to amend its infringement contentions. ECF No. 291 (“Mot.”). Unicorn asks this Court to reverse a portion of Judge van Keulen’s Order. Mot. at 1. Tesla opposes the motion. ECF No. 301 (“Opp.”). Unicorn’s motion is DENIED for the reasons described below. I. BACKGROUND Unicorn’s original infringement contentions were based largely on a published Tesla patent application (“Ozbek”) produced in this case. On the last day of fact…