Sandoval Delgado v. Diaz Marquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20235:23-cv-05141California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 WILFRIDO SANDOVAL DELGADO, Case No. 23-cv-05141-VKD

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

v. EX PARTE MOTION IN LIMINE

WITHOUT PREJUDUCE

VERANIA DIAZ MARQUEZ, Re: Dkt. No. 22 Respondent.

13 On December 20, 2023, petitioner Wilfrido Sandoval Delgado filed an “Ex Parte Motion in Limine” to exclude the testimony of an expert witness proffered by respondent Verania Diaz Marquez. Dkt. No. 22. The Court denies the ex parte motion without prejudice. If Mr. Sandoval objects to the proposed testimony of Ms. Diaz’s expert, he may raise those objections in accordance with the abbreviated pretrial preparation procedures outlined in the Court’s case management order. See Dkt. No. 20-1 at 4-5 (objections to witnesses). If the parties feel that they are unable to obtain necessary discovery prior to the December 29, 2023 deadline, the Court encourages them to discuss whether a modification to the schedule 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.