Frohm
Frohm v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARLENE FROHM, Case No. 22-cv-06002-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN COMPLAINT
FRANCISCO,
Re: ECF No. 42 Defendant.
12 In her second amended complaint, Plaintiff Darlene Frohm asserts discrimination, retaliation, and Federal Equal Pay Act claims against Defendant City and County of San Francisco (“the City”). ECF No. 41 at 10–11. The City has moved to dismiss only the retaliation claim. ECF No. 42. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. The Court dismissed Frohm’s retaliation claim from the first amended complaint, with leave to amend, as follows:
“To state a claim for unlawful retaliation under FEHA [California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act], a plaintiff must show that ‘(1) he or she engaged in a protected activity, (2) the employer subjected the…