Johnson v. City of San Jose

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20235:21-cv-01849California6,832 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KYLE JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01849-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. DAUBERT MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE

EXPERT TESTIMONY OF ROGER

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., CLARK AND DR. HARLAN WATKINS Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 110, 112

12 Pending before the Court are two motions (the “Motions”) filed by Defendants City of San Jose (the “City”) and Officer James Adgar (“Officer Adgar,” and with the City, “Defendants”) to exclude expert testimony of Plaintiff Kyle Johnson’s (“Mr. Johnson”) experts Roger Clark and Dr. Harlan Watkins. See Mot. Exclude Testimony of Pl.’s Expert Roger Clark (“Clark Mot.”), ECF No. 110; Mot. Exclude Testimony of Pl.’s Expert Dr. Harlan Watkins (“Watkins Mot.”), ECF No. 112. The Court heard oral argument on the Motions on December 14, 2023. Having considered the relevant law and the parties’ written submissions and oral arguments, the Court GRANTS IN PART and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.