Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 13, 20235:22-cv-04224California986 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S Plaintiff, MOTION TO MODIFY CASE

SCHEDULE

v. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 96 BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Ahmad Mukhtar Faizi filed a “Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief,” seeking relief for himself and on behalf of nominal defendant Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame”), against two of Falafel Flame’s directors, Baktash Temori and Masoud Rustakhis, as well as a number of entities, including allegedly unauthorized Falafel Flame restaurants. See Dkt. No. 1. On November 22, 2022, the Court issued a case management order setting deadlines, including a September 19, 2023 deadline for a hearing on dispositive/Daubert1 motions, as well as a January 24, 2024 final pretrial conference, and a 5-day jury trial beginning on February 12, 2024. Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.