Harrington
Harrington v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL J HARRINGTON, et al., Case No. 23-cv-06296-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY
v. RESTRAINING ORDER
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE Re: Dkt. No.
CORPORATION,
11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order. Dkt. No. 3. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the application. I. BACKGROUND On December 5, 2023, Plaintiffs – a group of former employees of First Republic Bank (“FRB”) who represent that they constitute a majority of the participants in FRB’s Deferred Compensation Plan – filed a complaint against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC” or “Defendant”). See generally Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). In their complaint, Plaintiffs allege that the FDIC, in its capacity as…