Sparkman
Sparkman v. Comerica Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAULA SPARKMAN, Case No. 23-cv-02028-DMR
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
v. FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT
COMERICA BANK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 52 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff Paula Sparkman filed this putative class action against Defendants Comerica Bank and Conduent Business Services, LLC alleging claims under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (“EFTA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1693, and California law related to Defendants’ operation of prepaid debit cards through which a state agency disburses child support payments. Defendants now move pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss and/or strike portions of the First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”). [Docket No. 48.] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Sparkman makes the…