Hartley

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROGER ANDREW HARTLEY, Case No. 23-cv-00767-PCP

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

9 v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART

10 D. BRIGHT, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Roger A. Hartley, an inmate at the California Institution for Men in Chino, California, filed 14 this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint is now before the Court for 15 review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Complaint is dismissed because Mr. Hartley has not stated a 16 cognizable claim against Dr. Bright, because he has not identified the specific ways in which the 17 other defendants caused him harm, because he has not identified institutional policies responsible 18 for his injuries, and because his request for equitable relief is moot. Dismissal is with leave to 19 amend. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 At all relevant times, Mr. Hartley was incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison 22 (“SVSP”). Mr. Hartley “suffers from severe neuropathic pain in his back, legs[,] and feet.” Compl. 23 …