Google LLC v. Does 1-3

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20233:23-cv-05823California1,515 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 GOOGLE LLC, Case No. 23-cv-05823-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

10 v. MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE

SERVICE

11 DOES 1-3, Re: Dkt. No. 15 Defendant. 12

13 14 Plaintiff Google LLC (“Google”) moves for an order authorizing service of the complaint 15 and summons in this action on unnamed defendants Does 1-3 by email and text message, pursuant 16 to Rule 4(f)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 15. The Court finds this matter 17 suitable for determination without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed 18 below, the Court grants Google’s motion. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 According to the complaint, defendants are three unknown individuals who pretend to be 21 affiliated with Google on social media pages, posts, and advertisements in order to trick members 22 of the public into downloading malware. Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 32-45. On November 13, 2023, Google 23 filed this action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.