Shah
Shah v. General Motors LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 POONAM D. SHAH, Case No. 23-cv-04319-SI
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S 10 GENERAL MOTORS LLC, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 34
12 13 Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the fourth and fifth causes of action of plaintiff’s 14 First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 34. Plaintiff opposes and requests leave to file a 15 Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 37. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court 16 determines that the motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the 17 January 5, 2024 hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion 18 to dismiss the fraud claims without leave to amend and DENIES defendant’s motion to dismiss 19 claims under the “unlawful” and “unfair” prongs of Business & Professions Code § 17200 20 (California’s Unfair Competition…