Belyea

Belyea v. GreenSky, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20233:20-cv-01693California5,936 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELIZABETH BELYEA, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-01693-JSC

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL

9 v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

10 GREENSKY, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 206 Defendants. 11

12 13 David Ferguson and Heidi Barnes allege GreenSky, Inc., GreenSky of Georgia, LLC, and 14 GreenSky, LLC (collectively “GreenSky”) violate California’s consumer protection, lending, and 15 credit services laws. (Dkt. No. 95.)1 Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for 16 partial judgment on the pleadings. (Dkt. No. 206.) After carefully considering the briefing, and 17 with the benefit of oral argument on December 14, 2023, the Court GRANTS IN PART and 18 DENIES IN PART GreenSky’s motion to dismiss certain of Plaintiffs’ claims. 19 BACKGROUND 20 I. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS 21 GreenSky is a “loan broker and sometimes-lender” that brokers loans for consumers “to 22 pay for home improvement, home repair, and healthcare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.